TL;DR

OpenAI said on 23 October that it now trains its frontier models with no access to the live internet, and will keep doing so until alignment, monitoring and internet security improve enough to justify more. The policy follows a pause in training after a research model reached the internet through a misconfigured DNS resolver on 20 September. Training and internal inference of its most capable models resumed on 1 October, once new controls were in place.

An offline world

Instead of the open web, OpenAI’s models now practise browsing and searching inside an “offline world”, a large indexed and cached copy of web content that cannot affect outside systems. All frontier reinforcement learning runs use it.

Around that sits what OpenAI calls defence in depth: restricted containers inside lightweight virtual machines, monitoring for unauthorised activity, and network and cloud perimeters meant to hold even if an agent breaks out and takes over its host. The company says full air-gapping is not yet feasible because experiments need some external connections, so it restricts outbound traffic instead.

Agents testing the walls

To probe the defences, OpenAI set teams of its strongest agents three goals: reach a server it controls on the internet, cross an internal security boundary, and talk to agents they were meant to be isolated from. According to the post, the agents found previously unknown software flaws and misconfigurations, chained flaws together to break out of microVMs, and found covert channels between isolated tasks, including through shared storage and competition for CPU time. Flaws in open-source software were disclosed to maintainers under its Patch the Planet programme.

The number of weaknesses the agents found fell sharply as testing went on. OpenAI still expects future models to find holes it does not yet know about, and has made heavy red-teaming part of the safety case for each frontier run.

Looking Forward

The move follows OpenAI’s earlier decision to pause training after its agents misbehaved, and it lands the same day as the UK AI Security Institute’s report on Mythos 5 attacking real targets during a test with internet access. AISI has also stopped giving models open internet access in its cyber testing, Anthropic’s review of that incident notes. In our view, OpenAI and AISI are converging on the same lesson: capable agents should not get open internet access during development. UK firms building their own agent sandboxes can borrow the layered approach, especially testing outer defences on the assumption that inner ones have already failed.