TL;DR

In an open letter to AI minister Kanishka Narayan, 115 charities and membership bodies working in health have asked the government to take the lead on national rules that make AI-written health content safe, Digital Health News reported on 6 November. Signatories include Cancer Research UK, Macmillan Cancer Support, Marie Curie, the British Heart Foundation and the Patient Information Forum (PIF), which hosts the letter online.

What the coalition wants

The core request is for ministers to bring AI companies, the NHS and wider health system, regulators, patient groups and the voluntary sector together to settle a baseline of safety for AI health answers. The letter also asks for a way to monitor how such content affects patient safety, public health and health inequalities.

PIF’s own summary lists the specific asks:

  • a recognised way to verify which UK sources can be trusted, extending PIF’s existing TICK mark;
  • AI systems serving UK users to put verified NHS and accredited UK sources first, and cite them;
  • guidance on high-risk subjects where people need steering to trusted help;
  • mandatory warnings where health content is AI-generated and may be wrong;
  • clear signposting to NHS services and specialist support.

The concern in the charities’ words

“After hearing the worrying words, ‘You have cancer’, what people need next is access to health information that is 100% accurate,” said Steven McIntosh of Macmillan. Dr Charmaine Griffiths, the BHF’s chief executive, called reliable information “a lifeline”. PIF chair Sue Farrington said patient groups worry people “may rely on AI-generated responses without understanding their limitations”.

Digital Health also points to earlier PIF research. In a survey published in September 2025, answered by 62 member organisations, almost half said they had seen inaccurate or misleading content about their field in AI Overviews, the Google feature whose health answers we have covered before.

The government’s answer

Responding, a government spokesperson said AI systems “should not be relied upon for diagnosis or medical advice”, and that ministers are “considering the full range of options where existing regulatory and safety mechanisms are insufficient”, including stronger action on chatbots.

What it means

In our view, the coalition’s asks are practical rather than prohibitive: they want AI to route people to trusted sources, not to stop answering health questions. That makes them easier for AI firms to adopt voluntarily, and harder for ministers to dismiss. For UK health information publishers, a verification scheme tied to the PIF TICK would turn an existing quality mark into a signal AI systems could be asked to honour.

Share this article